Establishment Continues To Demonize E-Cigarettes

Establishment Continues To Demonize E-Cigarettes

While the action of smoking has been a part of cultures around the globe for 1,000’s of years, only recently have smokers had a venture to smoke “without the smoke”. The reply is the e-cigarette and although they are available at mall kiosks around the US, most e-smokers get theirs through online vendors.

Touted by most e-smokers as a better, cleaner way to smoke, many health officials have stated misguided grievances with the products, such as there are no tests confirming e-cigarette safety. There have in point of fact been at any rate two separate health studies that confirm that e-cigarettes are safe for their intended purpose and are not a danger to bystanders. These studies originate from New Zealand and the UK from two different e-cigarette producers and both studies concluded that e-cigarette starter kits are much safer than smoking tobacco cigarettes.

The CDC announced in 2004 that their study on the chemical substances located in tobacco cigarette emissions came to the conclusion that there are over 4,800 chemicals and 69 carcinogens in tobacco smoke, but even though they contain in the majority of cases lower than 20 chemical substances, the Food and Drug Administration has proclaimed an import ban on e-cigarettes.

Remarks manufactured by e-smokers on forums, news articles, and weblogs indicate that e-smokers and even non- smokers alike are outraged by the FDA’s stance toward e-cigarettes, including Green Smoke e-cigarettes. The lives that the products could save are astronomical, since 1 in 2 individuals who smoke tobacco cigarettes will die as a result of smoking-related sicknesses. With the death rate being 1 in 2, many people are perplexed by the FDA’s attitude toward the success, but some are not surprised.

The United States brings in millions of dollars in cigarette tax revenue annually and e-cigarettes are decidedly a at a lower cost alternative to tobacco, because they’re not taxed above normal sales tax. In a totally free falling economy, the government needs all the money it can get its hands on, but at what cost?

Others suggest the effect the products could have on the pharmaceutical and anti-smoking industry. Anti-smoking coalitions will crumble after losing their reason to exist and pharmaceutical companies will no longer see a need for the stop smoking aids they produce, like suicide-inducing Chantix, manufactured by Pfizer.

Where does the line get drawn and what is most critical to the The States people? Putting money in the pockets of the now unpopular Federal Reserve private bank and death-dealing pharmaceutical firms or saving the lives of millions of those who have an addiction they were duped into years ago with cartoon camels and cowboys?

Filed Under: Electric Cigarettes